I agree .... and no, it was not a sudden change in the light. I'm gonna go for the simple explanation for the time being ;-)) Thanks!
Shel "Am I paranoid or perceptive?" > [Original Message] > From: John Forbes > > The simple explanation is usually the one to go for. The aperture is set > by the lens. The camera's only input is to activate the stop down lever, > and I would guess that that is something that either works or it doesn't. > > The camera of course has to fire the shutter at the correct speed, and I > would think that an intermittent problem here in such a well-tested and > common mechanism is rather unlikely. Again, these tend either to work > properly or not at all. > > So, in my view, and assuming it's not a sudden light shift, as Kostas > suggested, it comes down to the lens. You exercised it AFTER the event, > so it's working properly now, but it might not have been when you took the > picture.
