don't edit my post like that, it's totally unethical because you removed the following sentences I wrote which clearly explained WHY I wasn't just "repeating myself". If you cant argue the explanation's validity , don't just remove it to pretend there isnt one.
GET IT? jco -----Original Message----- From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 7:44 AM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:05:12 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >> I am not repeating the same argument >> over and over.............. > >Mark! Sorry, but I don't think I can include that in the 2005 quotations list. I'm way over quota in the "irony" category already. :) -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
