I am unlike you, I remember peoples postions and comments. YOU stated in a prior post that there was no need to support K/M because (paraphrased) "the two most important issues for users are PROGRAMMED AE and AF, so they wont be using km anyway" or something to that close effect. You specifically stated PROGRAMMED AE. Cant even remember your own most important things? You are crashing and burning dude. They call you a poser when you get busted like that,,, jco -----Original Message----- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:50 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request)
----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request) > No Bruce, don't get me wrong. I never stated that hyper manual is > invalid, of course its better to have it than nothing with K/M but > just like PROGRAM AE is better for some things than manual (William > Robbs "most important factor") Just to prove I am now reading the entire thread. Where did you come up with this little gem? You are lying to aggrandize your argument, you know that, don't you? William Robb
