Me, personally, I don't care whether or not anyone considers myopinion "hard evidence," and I'd actually be a bit concerned for theirmental state if they did. I tend to disbelieve in the existence ofhard evidence anyway. Facts and numbers can always beinterpreted/twisted to support both sides, so pick a position you'recomfortable with and don't sweat it too much if not everyone thinkslike you. There's no need to keep knawing on the bones of the deadhorse you've kicked the flesh off of. As for your playground i-said/he-said argument... well, you're bothbig boys; you'll sort it out eventually. Chris
On 9/23/05, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Chris, My post was intended to teach WR> a burden of proof lesson and I wasn't seriously demanding> a response. see my (hehe) I the wrote the post.> But even if I was serious your post would> be third party but not HARD evidence. That> would be more on the order of financial> statements ets from the retailers> and manufactuors etc... not just> another poster that aggrees or disagrees> with WR. The reason I made the sarcastic> post was he said he "knew for a fact"> but didn't provide proof. But when I> state things I know for facts that> he just doesn't believe he expects> me to provide HARD evidence like> pentax corporate documents,etc which> is absurd of course..> jco
