Pål Jensen wrote:
Lucas wrote:
Currently. That still does not prove an in-lens system is better in
principle. As a simile, public radio shifted from wireless technology to
wired and back at least two times in the last 100 years...
Right. Basically Canon had no choice being stucked with the in lens motor. This solution makes a totally electronic mount which is much cheaper to manufacture. Anything mechanical increase prices significantly these days.
In this case it's a case of mechanics vs. electric connections and a
motor, though, so the outcome is not quite that obvious...
- T
- Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax... Toralf Lund
-
