On 22/10/05, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed: >On 21/10/05, Glen, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Okay, this is starting to confuse me slightly. What is so "digital" about >>the essence of this image? > >The fact that it was manipulated to achieve the mono/colour effect.
I should say that (of course) I have no knowledge of how the image was manipulated. It could be wet printed and hand coloured for all I know. Shel mentioned he was in the digital doldrums, and I assume he put the image up as either an illustration of how he was stuck, or finding a way out of being stuck. Either way, technically it's up to Shel's usual excellent standard, but as a type of genre, I find mono/colour patterns like this - a sort of minimalist mosaic, if you like - of no interest. But that's my personal preference. I don't normally comment on a pic if I don't like it, usually pass on. However, I know Shel will glean something from it, and if nothing else will stir him into making a stew while he cogitates ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
