Just to put this stuff into perspective. With my first camera I took a
photo of water flowing over a dam under a bridge. I had to have a buddy
hold my legs while hanging upside down. I deliberately composted it at a
45 degree angle as that is the way I thought it looked best. I took the
film to my neighborhood drugstore for processing, as we all did back in
the early '50's. They did not even print the negative!
I raised so much hell about it that my Dad gave me a darkroom outfit for
my Birthday that year, which is how I happened to get interested in
serious photography. So, in a way, you guys can blame that drugstore for
your having to put up with me.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
Clerk: Out of 36 shots, 10 were out of focus, 15 were blurry, you accidently took
three pictures of the floor, you had tilted horizons in two others and the other six
were mediocre compositions."
geez, that's a pretty good roll by my standards...
But you'd have to explain to the clerk why you only wanted prints of the
15 blurry ones! (and maybe the three of the floor...)
