I've been shooting 'stuff' with a camera since my first 35mm (Kodak) received in 1950. I don't know if I've thrown away a hundred images in all that time. Boxes and boxes of negs., prints and slides stored everywhere possible. In the back of closets, under beds, stacked on shelves... Will they "someday" be a mine of rare and much sought after treasures? Well, at this point I'm thinking..neh! dump 'em. Still, I haven't started my dirt nap yet and 'ya never know. Such things become valuable when their source dries up, Right? I'll probably let the kids decide when I've cooled.
Jack --- Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 30, 2005, at 11:30, Toralf Lund wrote: > > Good point. One of the reasons why *I* haven't got digital yet, is > > > that I can't see myself deleting any pictures at all... > > > > For some people though, the fact that digital photos are essentially > > "free" (after the purchase of equipment) tends to make them snap far > > more frames than might be reasonable - resulting in, perhaps, far > more "throwaway" frames than might have been taken in the more- > cautious "film mode of use". > > Especially if one has the multi-frame feature enabled. bang-bang- > bang-bang-bang-bang can result in a quick sequence of 3-10 frames, > only some of which (or none of which?) are usable. > > -Charles > > -- > Charles Robinson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Minneapolis, MN > http://charles.robinsontwins.org > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
