Marnie, you are correct that my shots are better when I see a deeper meaning in them. Perhaps that is what is holding me back on this one. Thanks for commenting.
-- Bruce Thursday, December 1, 2005, 7:27:44 AM, you wrote: Eac> ========== Eac> I like it. Although I think I'd like it better without the top one being Eac> chopped off. Eac> Also,I think you do better when you see a deeper anthropomorphic Eac> philosophical meaning in nature -- from the universal to Eac> the macro -- family relationship Eac> or politics or something. ;-) Eac> Marnie Eac> In a message dated 12/1/2005 5:22:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, Eac> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eac> On 11/30/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have had this shot sitting in the electronic pile for awhile. I'm >> wondering what you all think of it. I am undecided, but there is >> something that holds my interest. Thoughts appreciated. >> >> Pentax *istD, Tamron 90/2.8 AF Macro, handheld >> ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/5.6 >> Converted from Raw using Capture One LE >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2191.htm >> >> -- >> Bruce
