Why should I care about film change time, it's a modest performance
requirement. Hell if I wanted to machine gun I could get a 100 frame
back for my LX, (I already have a MD).
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
Pentax shouldn't aspire to having better performance than Canon? I
personally would like to see 2-3 fps for 20-30 exposures. Rather
than a 4-8 fps burst rate, just match the performance that I could
get with a winder on my LX, that would be fine.
With or without the film change time?
Digital is a different medium. Sure, these things will get better, but
are they perhaps already better than film (with the correct metric)?
Kostas
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
