Gee, Scott, even though it's a fair amount of money, the FA 24-90 is one honey of a lens. I doubt you would find its equal in anything but a set of primes, or maybe the 28-70/2.8 (mucho money!).
Rick --- Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howdy! > > I'm considering enabling myself with a new zoom lens > or two. While I > don't really use zooms that much for my personal > photography, I've > been offered a handful of wedding jobs and am > looking at some faster > (f2.8) lenses. Pentax lenses would normally be my > choice, but they > seem to be expensive and rather hard to find these > days. Does anyone > have an opinion on zooms in the 24-90mm range (give > or take) from > Sigma, Tamron and Tokina? > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com > > -- > "You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
