Tom, it's hard to ignore repeated insulting e-mails. They're not robots. -Aaron
-----Original Message----- From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix Date: Tue Feb 7, 2006 11:49 am Size: 1K To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Those types of responses were definitely out of line. Why not just ignore those people instead of withdraw the request? Tom C. >From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net >To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net >Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix >Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 23:37:00 -0500 > >The messages I'm referring to were vulgar and aggressive. If you want to >know why the idea was canned, ask your brethren why they needed to write >"dear jackass" letters. > >I didn't expect that from the PDML, so yes, I didn't think this through. > >Please now, I am aware of my mistake; let's move on. > >-Aaron > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subj: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix >Date: Mon Feb 6, 2006 11:23 pm >Size: 479 bytes >To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > >In a message dated 2/6/2006 7:25:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I too was surprised by the negativity and suspicion. You can't lose >your copyright without expressly agreeing to the same. >Paul >======== >Okay, read rest of thread. I shouldn't have said anything. But someone >didn't >think this idea through. Obviously people would worry about copyrights. And >not everyone is informed about them, that there are inherent copyrights. > >Marnie aka Doe > >
