"Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I agree. I think the difference is that we proactively go in with that >knowledge (to PUG, photo.net, etc.) and accept the risk up front, whereas >here people were being asked to "trust" this person they didn't know and who >provided less than complete information. The gmail address did not help his >cause either.
We knew a lot more about him (vouched for by Knarf) than we do about the people who see and download our images from the PUG. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
