Doesn't "workflow" come from the corporate world? I've only ever called it workflow here on the list while responding to someone else who had called it workflow -- my digital darkroom actually was in my old colour darkroom, still said COLOUR DARKROOM on the door (though I added an Apple logo sticker), and I usually closed the door and turned off the lights when I went in.
I also had a brilliant old Kodak ad from the 1920s that I glued to the side of one of my monitors (I was running three computers -- one scanning, one doing the heavy lifting of correcting etc, and one running the printers) -- it had a woman sitting at a table with a hand-crank daylight film processor, under the legend "The Kodak girl at home". Emblazoned across the bottom of the ad, in Believe-It-Or-Not lettering was "THE DARKROOM ABOLISHED BY THE KODAK DEVELOPING MACHINE!" -Aaron -----Original Message----- From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: Bailing out. Date: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:48 pm Size: 2K To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net I'm like Shel. The word just bugs me is all. Whatever the hell it is I do only became called workflow since the advent of computers and scanning and digital storage/manipulation. What I do is "get film developed and have prints made". You (and everyone else) can call it whatever you want. <g> cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson