Excuse me ... I only asked a question, made no comments about what Photodo does or does not do. Methinks that you're replying to someone else. Read my message which you quoted.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: 6/28/2006 3:52:01 PM > Subject: RE: FA-50/1.4 (used) price > > Yes, you are wrong. Photodo tests a hell lot more than just one value, as > you stated earlier! Where did you get that idea? > Based on ebay prices, the F 1.4/50mm is more expensive used than the FA > version. Photodo is only PARTLY responsible for this. > The fact that this lens was only produced for a couple of years also makes > it rather rare compared to the 12-13 years of producing the FA version. > Regards > > Jens Bladt > http://www.jensbladt.dk > +45 56 63 77 11 > +45 23 43 85 77 > Skype: jensbladt248 > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Shel > Belinkoff > Sendt: 28. juni 2006 13:56 > Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Emne: RE: FA-50/1.4 (used) price > > > Are you basing your comment on what Photodo says, and nothing more? > > What has competition, prices, and people got to do with the absolute > quality of a lens? > > What's the relevance of your comment about the M50/1.4 and other 50mm > lenses on eBay got to do with the A,F, and FA lenses? > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Jens Bladt > > > Yes, I am. Photodo seem to think so. Nothing's ever the same after 5-10 > > years. Things change, right - glas, polishing, coating, the people > involved, > > competion, prices etc., etc. > > So how good is the M-1.4/50 1.4. There are loads of those at eekybay at > the > > moment, very few FA's, a few Takumar/Super Takumar and ZERO K-1.4/50mm > and > > ZERO F-1.4/50mm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
