keith_w wrote: >Jens Bladt wrote: > > >>I re-did the FA 1.4/50mm test shot. Put more effort in to focusing. This >>time I took off the UV-filter. >>Looks a little better: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/177097232/ >> >>I do, however, find the M 1.7/50mm to be a tiny bit sharper. If it's at all >>possible to actually see any difference. If not the whole matter is kinda >>pointless, isn't it. >> >> > >The M version 50mm/1.7 is known to be a very sharp performer. Has a reputation >for excellent resolution. Sort of an unknown lens except aficionados... >What they call a "sleeper." > > I already have one of those, of course. And an A-50/1.7, too.
I'm thinking that an auto-focus 50mm might be nice sometimes, though, and I'd also like to have an even faster lens... - Toralf -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
