On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jens Bladt wrote: > I re-did the FA 1.4/50mm test shot. Put more effort in to focusing. This > time I took off the UV-filter. > Looks a little better: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/177097232/ > > I do, however, find the M 1.7/50mm to be a tiny bit sharper. If it's at all > possible to actually see any difference. If not the whole matter is kinda > pointless, isn't it. > I think I'd choose the M-lens for close up work, though. I often did.
It's because it's the 1.7, rather than because it's the M. According to the Pentax bog-standard literature, they recommend the 1.7 for macro and bellows work, as it has a flat(ter) focus. Kostas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
