Nice work, Dag. I wouldn't hesitate to look at this at work or anywhere else. Beautiful picture. Paul
On Jul 25, 2006, at 10:32 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > Dag, > > Nice photo, but not one for work. > I would be uncomfortable looking at this on my work screen. > > At work, we live by the morals of the combined organization. > In the US, we have had lots of training on being sensitive toward > others, > so as not to offend them for their beliefs or preferences. > So I personally avoid looking at pictures that women could interpret > as somehow seeing them as objects rather than individual people. > > It's not really been a problem except for the guy who went to Thialand > and loaded a bunch of porn onto his company laptop. When he insisted > on playing it at work, one of the neighboring women complained and he > was marched out the door. > > Regards, Bob S. > > On 7/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In a message dated 7/25/2006 3:15:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> writes: >> Sorry it´s the best I can do on such short notice: >> http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=65890 >> >> DagT >> ======= >> That's nice, Dag. Makes a nice abstract. And it did have a >> warning. :-) So I >> looked. >> >> The human body is a thing of beauty. >> >> Marnie aka Doe >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
