Totally agree! Jack
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Davis" > Subject: Re: Some images... > > > It's the "choice" of a large segment of the viewing public. I've > always > noticed that Pop Photo's Pentax 645 shooting Fitzharris (sp) or the > editor's, 'real' them down considerably. Resolution is, IMO, the only > reason to shoot Velvia. > > It does make cheap zoom lenses look good...... > When Velvia was introduced, there was nothing like it on the market. > The > reason it did so well was because if you put a "normal" Ektachrome or > > Fujichrome beside it on a light table, the colours really popped out > by > comparison. > Art directors liked this, it was like 1 Hour Kodachrome. > > William Robb > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
