I suppose we could throw this back and forth from now on. Not that these sorts of discussions are not interesting, it's that I'm sure with both clearly see the other's point. Right? That last comment was a "clever" response to your "I will not be..." parting comments. Re-read it now and you'll break-up. Funny, HUH? .-))
Jack --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > It's not my intent to satisfy those folks. I do however think Velvia > has > the ability to more accurately render some scenes than others. It > may > indeed be garish when photo after photo displayed side by side has > the look. > > The other thing is, when looking at a digital representation of a > film > image,it's hard to tell exactly how the original image was rendered > on film. > It's not hard to make any digital color rendering exhibit > Velvia-like > characteristics. > > I don't get your last comments.... > > Tom C. > > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or > > numbered." > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >Subject: Re: Some images... > >Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:21:23 -0700 (PDT) > > > >Hi, Tom. Thought you'd be up pretty soon. :) > >Of course there are those looking for "brought up" images and if > it's > >your intent to satisfy these folks, (sales, kudos, etc) knock > yourself > >out. I do marvel at Velvia's resolution. > >Will you accept a radio collar? How about being "labeled" a famous > >photographer. I'll squash that rumor if you'd like.(?) > > > >Jack > > > > > >--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Wait a second Jack, am I reading you right? There's a good > reason to > > > use > > > Velvia? > > > > > > My contention has always been that Velvia is frequently appealing > > > because it > > > *brings the image up* in the viewers mind to the level where one > > > doesn't > > > think "the picture doesn't do it justice". > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, > debriefed or > > > > > > numbered." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > > > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > > > >Subject: Re: Some images... > > > >Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:35:31 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > > >Totally agree! > > > > > > > >Jack > > > > > > > >--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Jack Davis" > > > > > Subject: Re: Some images... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's the "choice" of a large segment of the viewing public. > I've > > > > > always > > > > > noticed that Pop Photo's Pentax 645 shooting Fitzharris (sp) > or > > > the > > > > > editor's, 'real' them down considerably. Resolution is, IMO, > the > > > only > > > > > reason to shoot Velvia. > > > > > > > > > > It does make cheap zoom lenses look good...... > > > > > When Velvia was introduced, there was nothing like it on the > > > market. > > > > > The > > > > > reason it did so well was because if you put a "normal" > > > Ektachrome or > > > > > > > > > > Fujichrome beside it on a light table, the colours really > popped > > > out > > > > > by > > > > > comparison. > > > > > Art directors liked this, it was like 1 Hour Kodachrome. > > > > > > > > > > William Robb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > > PDML@pdml.net > > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >__________________________________________________ > > > >Do You Yahoo!? > > > >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > >http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > >-- > > > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > >PDML@pdml.net > > > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > PDML@pdml.net > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >PDML@pdml.net > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
