It's *closer* in that it's related to the right part of the improvement, but it's not *the thing*.
-Aaron -----Original Message----- From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body Date: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:50 am Size: 531 bytes To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> At 09:26 PM 16/08/2006, you wrote: >On Aug 16, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: > > > You mean, "No grain/noise" is close, but (reduction of) sensor noise > > isn't. You are confusing me. (But that's the fun part of all this, I'm > > sure ;-)) > >No, I didn't mean that "no grain/noise" was close. > >-Aaron You said no grain/noise was "Way closer". If you didn't mean that, how are we supposed to solve this riddle? :-) Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
