Actually I perceive his post to be fairly accurate, based on the occcasions I've said anything negative regarding the Pentax product or company.
Tom C. "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered." >From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml >Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:15:44 -0600 > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Scott Loveless" >Subject: photo dot net thread mentioning the pdml > > > > There's a recent thread over at the photodotnet Pentax forum that > > mentions the PDML in a rather, well, unforgiving light. It made me > > laugh out loud. Enjoy: > > http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Hfdd&tag= > >I remember Wigwam. >I don't see anything in my archived sent items that insulted him, so it >wan't me that peed in his ear. > >William Robb > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
