Huh??? It's set by the camera. Like almost every other lens in the world today. Paul On Aug 18, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 19/08/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> A lens without an aperture ring is less likely to break no matter >> what you choose to do with it: it has fewer parts to break. > > Huh? It just doesn't have an aperture ring, the aperture isn't set by > magic otherwise. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
