Rob, I prefer my 24-90 on film to my 16-45 on the ist D, but the latter is still pretty darn good. Why are you planning to unload yours, and what will you replace it with?
Rick --- Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but I was hardly impressed with the WA view > that my A16/2.8, > A15/23.5 and A20/2.8 provided on my *ist D. Yes I > could replace them > with DA glass but from my limited experience I don't > think I'd be > overly impressed by the results. My DA16-45 is just > about to hit the > market. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
