David Savage wrote: >On 9/17/06, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 17/09/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Actually, there's no added complexity to the body because the body is >> > going to be made capable of controlling the aperture anyway (for >> > program and shutter-preferred autoexposure). >> >> Well they would have to add a very complex and extremely expensive >> positional feedback sensor ;-) > >I though it was only a $5 part?!
Someone posted recently that it wasn't a potentiometer, as had been believed by most of us, but a stepped resistor assembly and thus probably quite a bit more expensive than originally thought. -- Mark Roberts Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com 412-687-2835 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
