I'm talking actual experience, not testing. Conditions in the field determine practical use, not repeatable testing (which I could care less about).
And I mostly shoot with K/M or earlier glass, so I have no reason to knock it. Works great on the K100D other than the admittedly odd results with SR. The one newer lens that sees regular use is my 70-210 SMC-A. -Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Testing error? Seem anti shake should be based > On camera movement, not aperure. F stop has nothing > To do with image stabilization corrections, if it > Does in the camera that would be a mistake. Sure your > Not just trying to knock the K/M for no reason. > It also seems like something not easy to test scientifically > Because you would need repeatable shake and same > Focal lengths and optical qualities of the lenses to > Be sure. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Adam Maas > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:55 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K100D Anti-shake > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >>Someone commented the Anti shake in the K100d works >>Better with "A" than with KM" lenses. W H Y ? >>I do not understand how that could be true as the >>Camera shouldn't be handling them differently. >>Curious. >>JCO >> > > > I'm baffled as well, unless it takes absolute aperture into account > somehow. But I'm getting 1.5-2 stops from K/M glass and 2-3 stops from A > > and F glass on my K100D. > > -Adam > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
