It also depends where you are on the demand curve. I also don't believe
it would be only 1000 additional units. I think 10,000 additional units
might be more likely, I think they'll sell more than 1000 additional
units in the US alone.
Gonz wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Gonz"
>>Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>You dont think they get more than $50 profit per camera?
>>>
>>>
>>It doesn't really matter what the profit per camera is.
>>What matters is that they think the profit/loss margin on implementation
>>is going to be enough more positive than it would be if they left an
>>aperture simulator off, to make it worthwhile to include.
>>
>>
>
>Agreed, but Mark's argument was that if you sold 1000 units more because
>of the aperture simulator, you wouldnt make back the $50,000 it cost you
>to add it to a run of 10,000 cameras. Thats why the $50 profit
>question. Context my boy, context.
>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
