> > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/10/11 Wed AM 05:22:15 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. C. O'Connell" > Subject: RE: The JCO survey > > > > False, mechanical can be more reliable > > Than electronic in some sitations. It all depends on > > Good engineering. Bad engineering is what causes > > Problems, not necessarily whether its > > Mechanical or electronic. > > Can be more reliable is not the same thing as is more reliable. > I own three Pentax LX camera bodies. > This is the best camera they made, apparently > > All three have needed service because of flakey metering components. > Either the ISO resistor or the aperture simulator resistor has been > faulty on all three of my cameras. > On one of them, this has been a multiple repair issue. > Can be more reliable? > <whisper> Those are electronic components... </whisper>
----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net