Just because they don't care doesn't mean they shouldn't.
Mark Roberts wrote:
>William Robb wrote:
>
>
>
>>From: "Cory Papenfuss"
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> Unified customer feedback is the best way of
>>>>>reviving this (technically trivial) part of the classic K-mount.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Unfortunately that's the part that isn't going to happen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>... especially with sentiment like that on a "pro-pentax" list.
>>>It is not "inevitable." It is a (IMO poor) marketing decision that
>>>they
>>>should be made aware was incorrect. The quiet resignation of the
>>>"chosen
>>>few" only aids in the death-knell of the K-mount.
>>>
>>>
>>I invite you to come up with the numbers proving this.
>>
>>
>
>Good challenge.
>
>As I noted in an earlier message, check the DP Review and Imaging
>Resource message boards: There isn't even a whisper of discontent about
>this issue. Heck, I invite the fanatics on this issue, if they're so
>convinced they're right, to try to stir up some discontent in these
>places. You may deride the users of these fora as being just the
>ignorant masses, but that's precisely the point - they outnumber "us"
>by several thousand to one. And if they're aware of backwards
>compatibility at all, they're absolutely delighted with "green button"
>metering. (So am I, but then, I know how to meter...)
>
>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
