DagT wrote: > Den 14. okt. 2006 kl. 02.49 skrev Adam Maas: >>> >>> DagT >> I picked a couple egregarious examples. How about the Nikon D2Xs or >> D200, which are double and more than quadruple the cost of the K10D >> respectively. And are the same format. >> >> -Adam > > I don´t see the problem if K10D does the same job as D200 for half > the price. > > DagT > http://dag.foto.no > > Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side. >
The D200 does do some things the K10D doesn't (5fps, larger buffer, wireless flash control with the popup, 1/250th flash sync, 1/8000 max shutter, aperture simulator[sic], matrix-metering with old MF lenses) The K10D on the otherhand has SR and anti-dust, and costs about half as much. Personally (As someone who owns a fair bit of F mount glass) I chose the K10D, but that's simply because I want SR more than an aperture simulator (the other features are mostly irrelevant for my work). -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
