As I've said before, Pentax will have to make their AF a whole hell of a 
lot better before I'll concede it's worth buying all new lenses.

Christian wrote:

>William Robb wrote:
>  
>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Christian"
>>Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>Canon knew this 20 years ago, that is why FD lenses can't be adapted 
>>>>to
>>>>EOS cameras.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>but they can.  I have an adapter (true it has an optical element in it
>>>but is still allows infinity focus).
>>>      
>>>
>>Who makes the adaptor, and what is the quality like?
>>    
>>
>
>Canon.  It's usable but I only have 1 lens to use with it and it is not 
>a go-to focal length for me (i.e. not over 300mm).
>
>The point is there are a lot of NOs and NEVERs and CAN'Ts, when the 
>truth is that it CAN be done.  It was a concession to the screwed FD 
>users when the EF mount came out.  Trust me, I'm with you on the Canon 
>FD thing.  Those users were left with nothing.  They HAD to buy all new 
>lenses if they wanted to go AF.  Pentax and Nikon users could adapt slowly.
>
>
>  
>


-- 
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.

                        --Albert Einstein



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to