My error, drop the word "abandoning" from my post And it will make sense. Its an editing error. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 2:22 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: The JCO survey > CANON provided something new and improved in their EOS > Mount that the FD could never do, PENTAX hasn't. You are arguing on > both > Ends of the stick and you cant do that. On one hand > Youre saying abandoning Pentax is better than Canon > Because they didn't make their new A/F/FA mounts > Incompatible with K/M but on the other hand youre > Saying its OK to abandon K/M now with the DSLRs > For no reason. I have never said that Pentax has abandoned K/M. Your saying I did only shows that you are a functional illiterate, in that you cannot read and comprehend written English. You have been saying that Pentax has abandoned the K/M series, which is a false statement to make. If you repeat it often enough, people may start calling you a liar. The literature from Pentax indicates that K/M lenses are still usable on the newest camera (the K10). Please note, I think for the third time, but perhaps the second: The EOS mount had to be produced. This did not mean that the EOS mount couldn't have been made to accomodate the FD mount. Pentax managed it with the K-mount when they dropped the M42 mount. Nor does it mean that they couldn't have accommodated FD lens users by continuing to produce a couple of quality camera bodies in FD for a period of time. Are you to dense to figure that out? It's not a difficult concept to understand. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
