Essentially they do the same thing, I don't know if they use the same 
methods.

Shel Belinkoff wrote:

>The thought never crossed my mind.  I just figured that, since the K/M
>lenses didn't have the electrical contacts of the A series and later
>lenses, the multi point metering couldn't be implemented.  No "speculation"
>on my part - just an acceptance of the situation.
>
>While it might have been nice to know how to make the lenses provide multi
>segment metering, I really didn't care very much to waste time looking for
>a solution.  Others here are so much better at fiddling around with such
>things.  If it were an issue, I'd have just asked the list, and guys like
>Roberts would probably have an answer.
>
>BTW, isn't matrix metering what Nikon calls their system, and doesn't
>Pentax use the term "multi segment metering?"  Are the two the same, or is
>there some difference between them?
>
>Shel
>
>
>
>  
>
>>[Original Message]
>>From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
>>    
>>
> 
>  
>
>>>You probably also want matrix 
>>>metering with M lenses?
>>>      
>>>
>>...But, as we have said in a different thread, Pentax won't tell 
>>us what/if something has changed in the matrix metering of the DSLRs, 
>>so people speculate that this is just another mindless decision to 
>>cripple the cameras further. Sorry, to make them cheaper.
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.

                        --Albert Einstein



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to