Essentially they do the same thing, I don't know if they use the same methods.
Shel Belinkoff wrote: >The thought never crossed my mind. I just figured that, since the K/M >lenses didn't have the electrical contacts of the A series and later >lenses, the multi point metering couldn't be implemented. No "speculation" >on my part - just an acceptance of the situation. > >While it might have been nice to know how to make the lenses provide multi >segment metering, I really didn't care very much to waste time looking for >a solution. Others here are so much better at fiddling around with such >things. If it were an issue, I'd have just asked the list, and guys like >Roberts would probably have an answer. > >BTW, isn't matrix metering what Nikon calls their system, and doesn't >Pentax use the term "multi segment metering?" Are the two the same, or is >there some difference between them? > >Shel > > > > > >>[Original Message] >>From: Kostas Kavoussanakis >> >> > > > >>>You probably also want matrix >>>metering with M lenses? >>> >>> >>...But, as we have said in a different thread, Pentax won't tell >>us what/if something has changed in the matrix metering of the DSLRs, >>so people speculate that this is just another mindless decision to >>cripple the cameras further. Sorry, to make them cheaper. >> >> > > > > > -- Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. --Albert Einstein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net