I can see the immediate merit of proper grammar and punctuation... But then of course the precise reason why that very comma was interpreted in that very way in the article you posted totally escapes me. Probably some commas should have been inserted in the previous message ;-).
Thanks! On 10/26/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Recently a few messages here "discussed" the value of using good > punctuation and grammar in email messages. One of the participants made > comments to the effect that communication via email and on message boards > and mail lists was not important enough for him to take the time to add > apostrophes and other forms proper punctuation. > > With that thought in mind, imagine finding a very good example of why it > may be worthwhile to proof read your messages for clarity and intent. > > http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6383383 > > > Shel > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
