Any one of us can get out of hand on occasion. Shel, even you don't hold a candle to JCO. :-)
After putting up with the BS for a month now, there's two basic options we can take. 1. Ban him, which gets rid of him for good (I don't see at this point where that would be a loss). Of course he can come back again with a different e-mail address in which case he'd need banned again. 2. just nobody ever ever ever respond to his posts until he goes away. Fact of life. If you misbehave you get punished. Most people have learned that because Mommy and Daddy have taught them so. There's cause and effect. Action and consequence. JCO apparently believes he's above consequences. I don't. Tom C. >From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: list abuse >Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:10:09 -0800 > >I think Bill Robb's post pretty well nails the situation. The question is >what, if anything, should be done with JCO. I'm not really in favor of >banning individuals from this group (heck, I may be next - I can sometimes >be annoying or a PITA - my wife used to call me Shel Bellicose and even >went so far as to get me a license plate frame that had "Born to Annoy" >embossed on it), as quite a few of us at one time or another have gone a >little (or a lot) overboard. However, I don't think anyone has behaved so >badly with such consistency over so long a period of time. > >Of course, it really comes down to what Doug wants to do. Let's not get >the list population in an uproar, or become divisive about this. Doug, >where do you stand on this matter? > > >Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <pdml@pdml.net> > > Date: 11/11/2006 10:53:22 AM > > Subject: Re: list abuse > > > > I agree. I've had plenty of leeway for him in the past and I've even > > defended his right to make his points. > > > > I have now grown very very very tired of this rude and obnoxious >behavior. > > I personally vote to kick his *** off the list. It'll free up space in >my > > junkmail folder. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > > >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > > >To: PDML List <PDML@pdml.net> > > >Subject: Re: list abuse > > >Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:47:35 -0800 > > > > > >I disagree, Paul. A list owner's responsibility is to manage the > > >list, deal with technical issues of subscription and communications, > > >and deal with problem subscribers. JCO can go off and dominate the > > >list traffic on almost any topic. It creates bad will and a poor > > >image for the mailiing list, and for Pentax by association. > > > > > >Remember that the mailing list is archived and available anonymously > > >to the public. Do you really think it a good thing that a bazillion > > >messages full of such nasty dialog/diatribe is published associated > > >with your name, Pentax' name, etc? > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
