Gonz, Same thought has occured to me too with the L10D vs the *ist D. I seem to be getting more our of my lenses than before, more than I can attribute to just the 10 meg vs 6 meg. Shake reduction? Regards, Bob S.
On 12/5/06, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although I think that the antishake has to be part of the equation. For > normal handheld shots, it must add some effective resolution as compared > to a shot with even small amounts of movement. My K100D shots just seem > to be sharper than my *istD shots even though they are both 6Mp. > > rg > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Agreed. My mistake. > > Paul > > On Dec 1, 2006, at 11:37 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > > > > >>but you wont get the full 66 percent increase in > >>resolution unless you had an **infinately** sharp > >>lens. The actual increase is less, and signifigantly > >>less with average or mediocre lenses...This is not > >>taking IS into account of course. IS is a seperate issue > >>unrelated to sensor resolution... > >>jco > >> > > > -- > Someone handed me a picture and said, "This is a picture of me when I > was younger." Every picture of you is when you were younger. "...Here's > a picture of me when I'm older." Where'd you get that camera man? > - Mitch Hedberg > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
