Have, for many years, been a big fan and user "essentially grainless" 25, 50 and 100 ISO films. These were/are the films that I have replaced with digital, not so much for its work flow advantage, but because I see a cleaner more detrailed image. If film is your thing, knock yourself out.
Jack --- mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jack Davis wrote: > > > Pentax engineers (and others) refer to a desirable digital image > goal > > as having a "film look". To me, that means grain. > > Each viewer will have a somewhat different interpretation of such a > > statement, but is there some general generic understanding as to > what > > that means? > > Generic? No. Mainly because there were so many varieties of film. > Even some that were essentially grainless........ > > I suspect that they are more trying to avoid a "digital" look. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
