You may be absolutely right in what you say. Jack --- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the "look" is similar. I forgot to > post that in either of these cases > the film grain is NOT an issue. Its more > the tonal range captured and the look > of the extreme highlights. Film captures > more but the curves are not straight, > there is a knee on the hightlights. Whereas > digital can't capture as much range but there > isnt a knee, its straight right up to > the point of clipping... > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of > Jack Davis > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 9:15 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: The "Film Look" > > > I've had the same experience. Stills, by their nature, may lend > themselves to more scrutiny. > > Jack > --- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My interpretation of the "film look" is like > > watching a high quality movie ( 70mm print ) > > vs. a high defintion live video broadcast > > ( more like the "digital" look ). > > jco > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ____________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. > http://new.mail.yahoo.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
