I should be in bed. That URL I posted was an example of a shot I had to take at f32 to get dof, but it was with the 6x7. Rare that one would need that much dof with aps-c, unless perhaps for macro. Paul > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2609820&size=lg
On Dec 14, 2006, at 10:19 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Yes, I'm here. Must have hit the send button. Don't remember what I > was trying to say. But I'm definitely interested in the diffraction > limit. However, I generally try to avoid shooting at an ap smaller > than f11 to be on the same side. Of course there are situations that > require a smaller stop. But I figure if I have to have that small a > stop, I'm not going to worry about diffraction. http://www.photo.net/ > photodb/photo?photo_id=2609820&size=lg > On Dec 14, 2006, at 9:44 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > >> On 15/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> What Paul said. >> >> He's not often lost for words. You still there Paul? :-) >> >> -- >> Rob Studdert >> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 >> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ >> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
