Not only that, I bet some or most FF Pentax
lenses already have enough margin on their
image cirles to accomodate sufficient
SR displacements just like the APS lenses
have enough for the APS sensors.

And even if they didnt and SR was not
possible across the full frame, you
still could do SR across part of the frame,
the APS part, if needed. I dont see
why FF would totally preclude any SR under
any circumstances. I would rather have
a FF camers that still can do APS SR
if they had to, than an APS w SR camera that cant do FF at all.
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bob Sullivan
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 10:59 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Official Full Frame Pentax Rumor - Technical Limitations of
K


Tom,
Similar to my thinking in another thread.  I think Max Excursion in SR
is 2-3 pixels on a 3000+ pixel sensor.  No big deal... Regards,  Bob S.

On 12/21/06, Tom Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, they wouldn't have to go quite full-frame to get major 
> improvements in IQ and still have enough leeway for SR excursion for 
> the sensor, right?
>
> How about, say,  a 9/10-size sensor with  x1.1 crop factor? Just what 
> is max X/Y excursion of the sensor with SR engaged, anyway?
>
> Tom
> in SC
>
>
> Mark Roberts wrote:
> > David Savage wrote:
> >
> >
> >> The main argument at the moment is SR, as it is in the K100/10D, 
> >> wouldn't work. Supposedly current full frame Pentax lenses 
> >> projected image circle wouldn't be large enough to cover the moving

> >> sensor.
> >>
> >> As some people think that SR is more useful than a FF sensor, 
> >> that's their reason for thinking Pentax FF is a pipe dream.
> >>
> >> Time will tell.
> >>
> >
> > Pretty accurate summation.
> > My feeling is that Pentax simply won't have any choice in the 
> > matter: The demand for higher pixel counts and low noise will 
> > continue and it will force sensor size increases. The marketplace 
> > will make the decision for them.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to