I have a surround system, which is nice for movies and television sports (which are now frequently broadcast in surround sound -- you hear the crowd behind you:-), but I switch it over to stereo for music listening. I've compared and prefer the stereo. On Jan 3, 2007, at 6:12 AM, DagT wrote:
>> Fra: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> On 1/3/07, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I find it very convenient to have just plain stereo. Even with DVDs >> and all these multi channel sound tracks I get certain degree of >> reality. Of course 5+1 or 6+1 setup of similar quality would do >> better, but it will be real big PITA to haul this thing from one >> rented apartment to another ;-). > > Another thing is that the number of speakers will dominate your > livingroom .-) > > I have no intention to get more than two channels for listening to > music. Music has always been made and arranged so that we have the > sound coming from a large or small scene so that is enough. Also, a > good pair of speakers can make an illustion of three dimensions so you > can hear the singer is standing close to you or at a distance. > > Sorround systems may be OK for movies, but I do not want to feel that > I am part of orchestra. I want to be at one of the first seats in > front of it .-) > > DagT > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
