So would this be the complete Pentax DSLR sequence of release : *istD, DS, DL, DS2, DL2, K100D & k110D, K10D?
?? Or did the K110D actually come out later than the K100D?? jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:58 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2? Ergh, DS2 shortly after DL, not shortly after DL2. -Adam Adam Maas wrote: > Not quite, it's D, DS, DL, DS2, DL2. The DS2 came very shortly after > the DL2 and the DL actually outlasted the DL2 (the DL2 was in a 2 lens > kit ony, while the DL was body only and the 18-55 kit) > > -Adam > > > Paul Stenquist wrote: >> Yes, you're sequence is correct. >> >> On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:17 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> >>> I'll ask again, maybe nobody noticed. >>> What was the sequence of the model release dates? >>> >>> D, DS, DS2, DL , DL2 or what? >>> >>> jco >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>> Behalf Of >>> Godfrey DiGiorgi >>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:46 PM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote: >>> >>>>> - When I'm working on a tripod, I leave it on for the maximum time >>>>> and turn on the histogram display. >>>>> >>>> Impossible with the -D without manually hitting INFO every time, >>> no? >>> >>> Yes, it's only possible using the DS and later bodies. >>> >>> G >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
