All, After nearly 2 years, I'm still happy with my *ist-Ds (except for the name, of course). I'm getting results I like (even without Shake Reduction) and I'm really comfortable with it as a tool. I shoot only raw and have a post-processing workflow that I find fast and easy.
Soooooo, for all of you *ist-D[x] users out there who have upgraded to K10D's, can you comment on image quality improvements (or lack thereof) between the two camera generations? Does 10 really beat 6 in the real world? Your thoughts? Thanks, Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
