I just bought a small package of Rodinal. I don't know if it comes with
a chart as I haven't opened it yet, but I'd be pleased to have a copy of
yours. I couldn't find Agfapan 100 at the store I visited today, but I'm
sure I can get it elsewhere in town. In my previous photographic life, I
used Microdol X, both straight and 1:1. It's a very slow acting fine
grain developer. Recently, I've been using D-76 1:1, which is a
moderately slow soup. I'm going to try the Rodinal soon. I wonder how it
might work with the T-grain films. I've found that T-Max 400 (of which I
have an ample supply thanks to you :-), is much better in D-76 1:1 than
it is in the relatively hot T-Max developer. I wonder how it might look
in the Rodinal 1:100? Perhaps I'll try it. But I'd like to see the
Agfapan. I'm not sure that I'm committed to the T-Grains. It's been a
long time since I've shot a good quantity of conventional BW.
Best,
Paul

Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> 
> Hi Paul ...
> 
> There is a PDF file which has time/temps for a number of films with
> Rodinal @ 1+100 dilution.  I can't find the URL for it but I'd be
> happy to send you - or anyone who may be interested - the chart.
> Also, this comment taken from a message in a thread about Rodinal
> might be of interest for those looking for very fine grain:
> 
>         If you really want a rush, process Tech-pan 35mm
>         (rated at 25) in Rodinol at 1:200 for about 20 min
>         at 75 degrees. It's very continuous tone at that
>         dilution and there's no grain to focus on.
>         At 1:200, you could probably drink the soup and not
>         end up in the hospital.
> 
> Finally, be sure your Rodinal is fresh.  It should be almost clear, or
> with just a hint of purplish tinge to it.  If it's too dark it means
> it's oxidized and will give inconsistent results.
> 
> > I look forward to trying your combination.
> > I'm going to pick up some Agfapan and Rodinal
> > this morning. I've become a fan of slow acting
> > developers in general. They're easy to work
> > with, and the results are predictable.
> > Thanks for the tip.
> 
> 
> --
> Shel Belinkoff
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Why should I use a meter?  What if the darn thing broke on me
> when I was out making a photograph? Then what would I do?"
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to