I'll tell you what photography really needs, and that's a way to transform the photos and images in our mind into printed output. How many of us have taken what we thought to be a wonderful photo, imagining the final results, only to find that those results are crap? What happened to the superior image that we saw through the view finder?
Pentax has, in the past, been a leader in photographic and optical technology. I say, skip digital, and eschew the camera altogether. A few implants, some wires, and a computer connection placed discreetly on one's body, and you're ready to download. No problems with airline check-ins, no arguments about which lens is best, no pesky insurance premiums to remember to pay ... and best of all, everyone's imaging capability would be unique and their capacity almost infinite. Brendan wrote: > > Both of you be nice now. But what the MZ-s really > needs is a day timer, calculator and text messaging. > > --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mike mentioned a Pentax that had an alarm clock > > built into it. It's a > > shame that the clock wasn't connected to a timer so > > the camera could > > turn on the coffee machine in the morning. The > > phone would be a nice > > touch, especially with an auto-dial feature and a > > GPS. I feel that > > many cameras today are lacking in essential features > > which are so > > important in today's modern, fast-paced society. > > > > Nenad Djurdjevic wrote: > > > > > > > It's a shame that the MZ-S wasn't designed with > > interchangeable backs so it > > > > could be used either as a digital or film camera > > - then it truly would be > > > > able to "exist in a digital dominated future". > > > > And Aaron replied: > > > > > Yeah, and it doesn't have a phone in it, either! -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
