If you see ANY photo at 1500 pixels wide which is how I view them usually for full image, going smaller like to 800 pixels wide really hurts the details a LOT. Apparently you dont care or think it matters, but then why buy a 6/10Mp camera and not care whether your photos are reduced in details way down to only 1 Mp or less? jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:34 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... My heart goes out to you ... I can only imagine that your torment and anguish is akin to that of Van Gogh's. Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: 4/2/2007 7:24:04 AM > Subject: RE: Web Gallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > I agree, thats why I didnt want to go any smaller > than 1200 pixels wide, it already is degraded > even at that resolution, going smaller makes > it worse, not even to mention having to convert > them to sRGB for PC usage. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Shel Belinkoff > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 9:44 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: Web Gallery > :Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > What hubris ... > > Putting the pics on the web "ruins" them. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
