I said this was just a temporary quick and dirty, higher image quality posting to a group, the rest of the internet world doesnt even know it exists. If I was going to do something more permanent or important, I would use multible image size photos and bigger thumbnails,,,This was a just a "stock" photoshop web gallery automatic type deal to make it easier to post a bunch of photos in a hurry... jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Savage Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:21 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... Suit yourself. All I know is your bucking a lot of tried and true practices for displaying images on the web to suit your vision of how the rest of the internet using population should be working. Cheers, Dave At 09:30 AM 3/04/2007, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >Do the math, it aint anywhere near >240ppi, the data you are using/reading/believing is incorrect...The >screen would have to be only 5" wide to get 240ppi with a 1200pixel >wide image. I dont know anybody using that size screen or >screen resolutions so extremely high that the displayed >image would only be that wide on a typical 19" screen. >jco > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >David Savage >Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 9:07 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: RE: >WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > >I'm getting my numbers from your files John. Here's a basic Photoshop >lesson. > >Open a file in PS, this one will do: > ><http://www.jchriso.com/temp/BJWPB2007/images/BJWPB2007-000.jpg> > >Go to Image>Image Size... You will note: > >Pixel Dimensions >Width: 1200 pixels >Height: 801 pixels > >Document Size: >Resolution: 240 pixels/inch (that's pixels per inch, or ppi) > >As I said, 240 ppi is a print resolution, 72 ppi is plenty enough for >web images. > >Dave > >At 01:01 AM 3/04/2007, you wrote: > >I dont know where you are getting 240ppi number from but > >on a typical 19" monitor even a 1200 pixel wide image > >is only about 100ppi which is NOT overkill, I can easily > >see the improvement over 800 or even 1024 pixels wide. > >jco > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > >Of > > >David Savage > >Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 12:02 PM > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >Subject: Re: > >WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > > > >Personally I always use 1024x768 as my assumed baseline resolution > >for preparing web images, even though my system runs at 1280x1024. If > >I think a particular shot suffers because of this, then I add a link > >to a > > >higher resolution file. > > > >And BTW John, 240 ppi for a web image is massive overkill, that's > >print > > >resolution. 72 is more than enough & it also results in smaller files > >which is a bonus for those on slower connections. > > > >Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
