My concern is if you are going to do no better than the competition, and they are more entrenched, how are you going to compete. The motto "We're no worse than the rest" comes to mind.
A full frame CCD was, IMHO, one of the big differences between the Pentax and a D30 or D1. Pentax may be able to sell a lesser model to some of us, but it will *not* lure Canon and Nikon users away. You don't really gain any market share. At best, you may hang on to what you have. But it seems that you are sending the same old signal, "we will not compete." Gives all of use considering digital more reason to examine Nikon and Canon offerings. Bruce Dayton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brendan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:18 AM Subject: Re: Pentax Digital NEWS! Part one > This might be a good thing!! a decent d30 class > digital SLR may get more K-mount development going. > > --- tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rob Brigham wrote: > > > > > > So we go from 6MP release this year to 3MP first > > glimpse next year (and > > > probably released 2003!). This is not good > > Pentax!! > > > > Plus the ccd is probably not full-frame. > > > > tv > > - > Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
