Good point but if Pentax does "We're no worse than the rest" but it costs less ( we hope ).
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My concern is if you are going to do no better than > the competition, and > they are more entrenched, how are you going to > compete. The motto "We're no > worse than the rest" comes to mind. > > A full frame CCD was, IMHO, one of the big > differences between the Pentax > and a D30 or D1. Pentax may be able to sell a > lesser model to some of us, > but it will *not* lure Canon and Nikon users away. > You don't really gain > any market share. At best, you may hang on to what > you have. But it seems > that you are sending the same old signal, "we will > not compete." > > Gives all of use considering digital more reason to > examine Nikon and Canon > offerings. > > Bruce Dayton > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brendan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:18 AM > Subject: Re: Pentax Digital NEWS! Part one > > > > This might be a good thing!! a decent d30 class > > digital SLR may get more K-mount development > going. > > > > --- tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Rob Brigham wrote: > > > > > > > > So we go from 6MP release this year to 3MP > first > > > glimpse next year (and > > > > probably released 2003!). This is not good > > > Pentax!! > > > > > > Plus the ccd is probably not full-frame. > > > > > > tv > > > - > > Get your free @yahoo.ca address at > http://mail.yahoo.ca Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
