On 22 Oct 2001, at 21:13, Doug Franklin wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:37:57 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
> 2) How does the "absolute resolution" of the captured image compare > between this undersampling and the "full" sampling performed by, e.g., > a flatbed or film scanner. Well we can only postulate if we aren't in the business but I would bet that there ain't much chance of seeing 48bit (or 12/14 bits per colour plus padding) too soon. This means that for the mean time, there will be a broadening gap between the quality of a good film scan vs the output of a digital camera most notably in the areas of subtle gradation such as cloudy skies. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
